Welcome! This is a website that everyone can build together. It's easy!

pols207 SyllabusThis is a featured page









POLS 207: Contemporary Issues in Public Policy
Jose Marichal, Ph.D.
California Lutheran Universtiy
Department of Political Science
E-mail: marichal@callutheran.edu
Office: G Building: Room 7

ThickCulture Blog

Twitter Feed

My Website

Netvibes Portal


COURSE GOALS:
This course is about people coming together to make collective decisions about what constitutes "the good life." All of us have things we care deeply about, aspirations and dreams, but we can't achieve these things on our own. We live in a society with others and through the political process, we make decisions every day that affect people's ability to live their version of "the good life." This course is about two things. First, it is about developing your view of "the good life" - i.e. what are your dreams and aspirations for yourself and for the world and (2) how can we make collective decisions that allow people to enjoy "the good life." In this course we will look at: Who makes collective decisions? What criteria do they use to arrive at decisions? How do people promote preferred solutions? Why are obvious problems not addressed? This class will engage you in the process of public decision making. You will be asked to think about your own personal goals and how they connect to the society you live in. You will look at the policy process surrounding your goals and how to go about changing that process if it produces unwanted results. Throughout the course, we will work towards developing policy solutions that will affect the things you hope to achieve in life.

This course will address the following CLU General Education Goals:
  1. Oral and Written Communication Skills
  2. Understanding of Cultural and Global Diversity
  3. Critical Thinking
  4. Growth in Identity and Values
  5. Ability to work in groups
This course will address the following Political Science Department Goals:
  1. Critical Thinking
  2. Exposure to Cultural Experiences
In this course, students are expected to:
  1. employ different theoretical approaches towards understanding specific policy issues
  2. exhibit critical thinking and effective writing and oral skills by applying readings to issues of concern.
  3. demonstrate the ability to work with other students in groups to locate and present information.
  4. show an ability to find, evaluate, use and communicate information in both oral and written formats.
  5. demonstrate the ability to communicate orally in a manner that is clear, organized, and appropriate to the intended audience.
  6. know how to apply appropriate evaluative criteria to assess their own presentations and those of others.

CLASS REQUIREMENTS:
Any aspect of this syllabus can be changed by the instructor at his discretion.

Readings for the day need to be completed prior to class times, as class activities, discussions, and quizzes will primarily draw upon assigned readings.

Talking, working, and thinking with others are large parts of this class. We will get into discussions about some controversial subjects. I encourage expressions of opinions (myself included), but there are some classroom boundaries. Our class will be a safe place. That is to say, we will all treat each other in a respectful manner. Translation: rude interruptions, hurtful insults (including racial, gender, sexuality, etc. slurs), and personal attacks will not be tolerated. You may not always be comfortable with the topics, and by no means are you expected to approve of everything we discuss.

California Lutheran University is committed to providing reasonable accommodations to students with various documented disabilities (physical, learning, or psychological). If you are a student requesting accommations for this course, please contact your professor at the beginning of the semester and register with the Coordinator for Students with Disabilities (Pearson Library, Center for Academic Resources, Ext. 3260) for the facilitation and verification of need. Faculty will work closely together with you and your coordinator to provide necessary accommodations.

Academic Honesty: Plagiarism, cheating and other forms of academic dishonesty will not be tolerated in this class. According to the CLU student handbook, plagiarism occurs “whenever a source of any kind has not been acknowledged.” With respect to my policy, let me be clear – you will receive and F in the course if you take material from the Internet and insert it into any written work as your own without giving credit to the person who wrote it. Those found violating the CLU code on academic dishonesty in any way will receive an F in the class.

All quizzes, exams, activities, and papers must be turned in on time: no make-ups will be given, and no re-writes will be offered. If an assignment is of the take-home variety, it must be typed, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins all around, spell-checked, grammar-checked, and demonstrate correct citation and bibliographic format. Late take-home assignments will not be graded unless you have documentation of an emergency. Missed quizzes will be marked down as zeroes

COURSE ASSIGNMENTS
Your grade will come from the following assignments:

Blog Entries: Yyou will be asked to create a blog based on an issue you identify as important to you (Setting up a Blogger blog). This blog will serve as the basis for your policy project. Each week, I will ask you to respond to a question I ask based on the readings that relates to your policy project. The questions are designed to get you to think about a policy issue of your choosing and to develop your thinking about the policy issue as the semester unfolds. Each entry can be considered as a "piece" of your final policy project. The assignment is designed to think about your individual passions and how they are affected by the larger political society. Each entry will equal 1 points and I will ask you to create 10 blog entries. They will be graded pass/fail based on whether you do the assignment in a timely fashion, and whether you put mental effort into the assignment.

Blog Entries 15 X 1 = 15 points

Pecha Kucha Presentation: One date during the semester, your group will be asked to give a 7 minute Pecha Kucha presentation based on the blog question I asked the class to respond to. You will create a 20 slide-six minute and 40 second presentation that engagingly answers the question asked in the blog assignment. The presenation should educates the class about the policy issues at stake and also should lead into a discussion about how the rest of the class should think about how the readings relate to their final projects. You will lead a 10-15 minute discussion after the presentation intended to get the class to reflect upon how the different aspects of the policy project affects our core passions. To guide the discussion you will provide questions that build upon the material covered for the week. Here are examples of Pecha Kucha presentations.

Pecha Kucha Presentation = 1 X 10 points = 10 points

Diigo Portfolio: part of your grade will come from your level of engagement with the readings and class assignments. I will ask you to create a portfolio of content on Diigo, a social bookmarking site that allows you to share bookmarks, create and respond to forum questions and add highlights and comments to existing articles. You will be required to post one comment each week on the readings. You are strongly encouraged to post more than once. You will earn 1 point for each time you post a comment on the readings. Here is a link to the class Diigo Page.

Diigo Portfolio .5 X 10 times = 5 points

Exams: We will have two in-class exam in which you will be asked to apply the theories and concepts learned to current issues public policy. The first exam in late October will address issues discussed during the first two sections of the course. The second exam in early December will cover the last two sections of the class. The exams will be a combination of multiple choice, short answer and essay. Each essay exam will be worth 20 points.

Exams: 20 points each + 2 Exams = 40 points

Final project: Each of you will produce a resource web page that provides visitors with an introduction to the issue you have identified, an description of the origins and causes of the issue, possible solutions and a suggestions for addressing the problem. The website should include: a statement of the problem you are examining, a discussion of the decision process that led to the current state of the issue, an examination of the social process that describes the issue, an examination of the alternative solutions to the issue and a well-developed strategy for implementing that strategy. On selected days, you will conduct a 10 minute seminar that summarizes your progress on your website. Your peers will evaluate your performance in class and provide you with anonymous feedback. You will also present your work in a "Pecha Kucha" format during the final week of class via a presentation that will build upon your pecha kucha presentation from earlier in the semester. This final resource website and the presentation will be worth a combined 30 points (20 points from the web resource and 10 points from the presentation).

Students must invite relevant stakeholder to the presentation

Final Paper and Presentation = 30 points

Assignments Summary
Blog -- 1 points X 15 entries = 10 points
Exams -- 20 points X 2 exams = 40 points
Diigo Portfolio = 10 points
Pecha Kucha Presentation = 10 points
Final Paper and Presentation = 30 points

Course Readings:
Stone, D. Policy Paradox. WW Norton Press.
All Other Readings Accessible On-Line.

Schedule of Readings


Week 1: Introduction

Sept 2
Introduction to the Course


Sept 4: What are Policy Conflicts?

Required
Stone Chapter 1: The Market and the Polis
Randy Pausch's Last Lecture
September 4th Slide

Assignment: Look through different websites that identify issues and select one that "connects" with you. Be ready to talk about your choice in class. Next week we will vote on which issues we will choose for our semester long projects.

Speakout.com
Global Issues.org
Lutheran World Relief
Catholic Relief Service
Global Policy.org
worldchanging.com
Human Rights Watch

World Policy Institute
United Nations


Week 2: Value Conflicts
Sept 7: No Class (Labor Day)

Sept 9: What is "Good Policy?"


Jones, D. (2008) The Emerging Moral Psychology. Prospect UK.

WNYC RadioLab (2006) Chimp Fights and Trolley Rides. Audio.

Sept 9. Slides

Blog Assignment #1: Create your blog. Use this
website as a resource . Give your blog a name and a theme that describes the issue you will be studying this semester. Be ready to talk about your blog....i.e. memorize the URL address of the blog.

Sept 11: Defining Equity


Required
Stone Chapter 2: Equity
Slides


Week 3: Equity and Efficiency

Sept 14: What is Equitable?


Required
Moorhead, J. (2006) Different Planets. The Guardian.

Nussbaum, N. (2008) John Rawls and Our Plural Nation. New York Sun.

Slides

Sept 16: What is an efficient outcome?

Required
Stone Chapter 3: Efficiency

Blog Assignment #2: Using the readings from the last two class sessions, think about what an equitable outcome would look like for the issues you care about. What does a "fair" outcome look like for the issue you're working on. What would be the best way to achieve fairness? The market or the polis?
Slide


Sept 18: What is an efficient outcome?

Required

Bailey, R. (2008) Does the Invisible Hand Need a Helping Hand. Reason Magazine.

Economist. (2008) It's Mine I tell You: Mankind's Inner Chimpanzee.

If the link doesn't work, then past this address into a browser:
http://www.som.yale.edu/Faculty/keith.chen/articles/Economist%206_19_08.pdf

Monkey Trap Story

Week 5: Security
and Liberty


Sept 21: What is Security?

Required
Stone Chapter 4: Security

Blog Assignment #3: Using the readings, what would an efficient outcome is the most efficient way to achieve a desired goal on the policy issues you care about? What would an efficient outcome look like? What would be the best way of achieving an efficient outcome? The market or the polis?


Sept 23: What is Security?
Wolfshenk, J. (2009) What makes us Happy. The Atlantic Magazine.
Slides


Sept 25: What is Liberty?

Required
Stone Chapter 5: Liberty

Slides

Blog Assignment #4: Using the readings, what does a "secure" outcome look like for the policy issue you care about? What would be the best way of achieving "security" on the outcome? The market or the polis?

Week 6: Defining Liberty

Sept 28 What is Liberty?


Required
Berlin, I (1958) Two Concepts of Liberty in Four Essays on Liberty (only pages 1-10).

BBC (2007) The Trap - We Will Force You To Be Free.Video.

Slides

Sept 30
Stone Chapter 6: Symbols

Slide

Section II: Defining Problems

Week 7: Framing

Oct 2: Frames and Heuristics
Blog Assignment #5: Using the readings, what is the definition of "free" that best applies to the issue your studying? What would "freedom" look like? What would be the best way of achieving a "free" outcome? The market or the polis?
Slide

Required
Schrager, A. (2008) How to Cheat at Everything. Intelligent Life.

Iyengar, S. (2009) How Framing Influences Citizen Understanding of Public Issues. Frameworks Institute.

Persuaders Film: We'll watch in class

Oct 5: Symbols and the Brain

Required
Westin, D. (2007) The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. Excerpt.

Haidt, J. (2008) What makes people vote republican? edge.org

Interview with S. Carter (2009) Governance and the Yuk Factor. The Philosopher's Zone Podcast.

Silde

Final Project Workshop: Creating a website

Yola

Moonfruit

Squarespace


Blog Assignment #6: How are frames used to shape thinking about your issue? Is the public being manipulated by this issue or do they have an accurate picture of what's going on?

Oct 7: Stories and Politics

Required
Hsu, J. (2008) The Secrets of Storytelling. Scientific American.

WARNING; This article is a bit tricky to access, but if you try the link a few times it eventually lets you look at the whole thing. Don't give up after one try!!!!!

May ask for a log in....if so copy this into a browser.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-secrets-of-storytelling

or this

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-secrets-of-storytelling&print=true


Iweala, U. (2008) Stop Trying To 'Save' Africa - washingtonpost.com

For some reason, a direct link doesn't work, but if you past this URl into a browswer, you can get the article.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/13/AR2007071301714.html

Oct 9: Fall Holiday - No Class

Week 8: Uses of Data

Oct 12: The Uses of Data
Blog Assignment #7: Pick an image that represents the issue you are studying, post it to the blog and discuss how the image would frame the debate among the public.

Required
Stone Chapter 7: Numbers
Slide

Oct 14: Policy and Science

Required

Hans Rosling: New insights on poverty and life around the world. TED Talk..

Paulos, J.A. (2001) Why Fuzzy Math Makes Sense in Politics. ABCNews.com




Oct 16: Review for Exam #1

Review sheet
Wesch Video

Oct 19:
Exam #1

Week 9: Causal Stories
Oct 21: Causal Stories in Politics
Blog Assignment #8: Find a piece of data that relates to the policy issue you are studying. What type of story does it tell? How can the data be used to tell a story that promotes your view of the ideal policy outcome?
Slides

Required
Stone Chapter 8: Causal Stories

Oct 23: Causal Stories Cont.


Shermer (2008) Patternicity: Finding Meaningful Pattterns in Meaningless Noise. Scientific Amreican.

Additional/Optional

Boltanski and Thevenot (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton University Press. Chapter 1


Week 10: Coalition Building

Oct 26: Policy Updates: Presenting Information

Smith, F (2007) Intelligent Designs. STANFORD Magazine.

MIT Communications Office. (2006) How to Work With the News Media to Tell Your Story. -- Power Point Presentation

slide

Blog Assignment #9: Think about the different causal stories that could be told about your issue. Which one do you think is correct? Do people generally see it the way you do? Why or why not?
Oct 28: Interests

Required
Stone Chapter 9: Interests
Slide


Oct 30: Interests and policy


Required
Pinker, S. (2008) A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE. Edge.org

Meacham, J. (2008) The Story of Power. Time Magazine.

Lowi, T. (1972) Four Systems of Policy (Only chart on 300).

Additional
Interview w/ Rene Girard. (2009) Stanford Magazine.


Week 11: Policy Opportunities


Nov 2: Interests and Politics

Required

Lincoln, E. (2008) Winners without Losers. Carnegie Council Symposium.

Dennett, D. (2006) Ants, Terrorism and the Possibility of Memes. TED talk.



Nov 4: Decisions


Required

Stone Chapter 10: Decisions
Blog Assignment #10: Who are the interests involved in your issue? Which interests should be involved that aren't? Should you classmates be involved in your issue? Why aren't they if they should?
Slide

Nov 6: Decisions - Cont.

Required
Schneider and Ingram (1993) The Social Construction of Target Populations. American Political Science Review.

Gawande, A. (2009) The Cost Conundrum. The New Yorker.

Week 12: Inducements
Nov 9: Decisions - Cont.
Slide


Required


Fung, A. (2006) Empowered Participation. Chapter 1. Princeton University Press.


Ober, J. (2009) Democracy and Knowledge - Chapter 1. Princeton University Press.

Section III: Creating and Promoting Solutions

Nov 11: Inducements


Stone Chapter 11: Inducements
Blog Assignment #11: How are the targets of your policy study constructed? How does this affect policy? What if the targets got to use their "local knolwedge" to make policy on their own?\
Slide

Nov 13: Inducements
Lynch, M. (2009) Jay-Z vs the Game: Lessons for the American Primacy Debate. Foreign Policy.

Rosenberg, T. (2008) A Payoff out of Poverty? New York Times.`

Dan Pink Ted Talk

Week 13: Rules

Nov 16:
Rules
Stone Chapter 12: Rules
http://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dgm9wvr8_1014f37k3wgf



Nov 18
Rules Cont.
Blog Assignment #12: What policy tools would help improve policy outcomes on the issue you care about? Would inducements be better than sanctions?
Moss and Mekehnett (2008) The Guidebook for Taking a Life. New York Times. (you might need to register)

Cohn, J. (2007) System Failure. Boston Globe.

Additonal
Scola, B. (2009) The New Interface of Government. Seed Magazine.

Nov 20
Required
Progress Reports

Blog #13: What are the rules that govern behavior of the targets in your issue? Are they good or bad rules? Do they accomplish their purpose? How can they be improved upon?


Week 14: Facts

Nov 23 - Facts

Stone Chapter 13: Facts
Slide

Nov 25 - 27: Thanksgiving Holiday (No Class)

Week 15: Rights

Nov 30 - Facts

Required
Dryzek, J. (2002) A Post-Positivist Policy-Analytic Travelogue. The Good Society.

Brukley and Anderson (2007). Using the Science of Persuasion in the Courtroom. The Jury Expert.

Final Paper and presentation




Dec 2: Rights


Required
Stone Chapter 14: Rights

Slide

Blog Assignment #14: What is a "Fact" on the issue you are studying? In what way is it a fact? How do you know it's true?

Dec 4: Rights

Required

Power, S. (2001) Bystanders to Genocide. The Atlantic Monthly.

(2007)100 Years of Human Rights in the U.S. Yes! Magazine.





Week 16: Exam and Final

Dec 7: Exam Review
Review

Creating Online Pecha Kuchas

Blog Assignment #15: Describe a right that relates to your issue? How do you know it's a right? Does everyone agree it is a right? Why or why not?

Dec 9: Exam #2

Dec 11: Final Policy Presentations







General Additional Readings


Meacham, J. (2008) The Story of Power. Time Magazine.

Nivola, P. (2007) Rediscovering Federalism. Brookings Institution.

Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in ... - Google Books Result

Treisman, D. (2007) The Architecture of Government.Cambridge University Press. Excerpt.

Bell, D. (2007) Veil of Tears. Powell's.

Kagan (2006) Power and Weakness. Hoover Institution.

Western, B. (2006) Reentry. Reversing Mass Imprisonment. Boston Review.

Donahue and Stier (2008) The Next FEMA. Washington Monthly.

Scott, James. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Introduction. and Chapter 1 (need to register)

Spanos, C. (2008) What is a Real Utopia? Zmag

Gladwell, M. (1999) "Six Degrees of Lois Weisberg," The New Yorker.

Scrivner, L. (2008) No Wink, but a Nudge Can Work Wonders. TheStar.Com

What Would a Unicorn Do?

Nobel, C. (2008) Failure is an Option. Portfolio.com.

Wenner, M. (2008) Bad Decision Makers Lack reasoning Skills. Science Daily.

Watts, D. (2007) Is Justin Timberlake a Product of Cumulative Advantage. New York Times.

Senge, P. Learning Organizations. SOL.

Dotmocracy


Hunger in the USA. On Point Radio Show.


George Lakoff on Embodied Conceptual Metaphor

Hess and Finn (2007) No Child Left Behind Needs some Work. Policy Review.

Waldman: Government is Back. The American Prospect.


Karch, A (2007) Democratic Labroatories: Policy Diffusion in the American States. Univ. of Michigan Press.

Mead, L. (2001) Welfare Reform: Meaning and Effects. Policy Currents.

Potoski and Prakash (2001) Protecting the Environment: Voluntary Regulations in Environmental Governance. Policy Currents.

Rom, M. (2001) From Welfare State to Opportunity and Responsibility (OAR), Inc. Policy Curents.

Potoski, M. (2002) Implementation, Uncertainty, and the Policy Sciences. Policy Currents

Tatalovich, R. and A. Smith ( 2002) Status Claims and Cultural Conflicts: The Genesis of Morality Policy. Policy Currents.

DeLeon, P and K, Kaufmains (2002) Public Policy Theory: Will It Play in Peoria? Policy Currents.

Elster, J. (2008) Reason and Ratonality. Excerpt.

Archibigi, D. (2008) The Human Rights Decleration at 60. Open Democracy.

Rosen, J (2008) Man Made Disaster. The New Republic.

Keen, A. (2009) In defense of sleazy lobbyists. The Daily Beast.

Schneider (1993) How the social construction of target popualtions contributes to problems in policy design. policy currents.

Knott (1993) Policy Change and Deregulation: Explaining Differences in Legislative Outcomes. policy currents.

Williams-Derry (2008) Fighting congestion, RAND-style. Grist.

  • Cohen and Sardell (1994) Policymaking for Children's Issues. Policy Currents.

  • Johnson et. al. (1994) Children and Welfare Reform. policy currents.





  • No user avatar
    marichal
    Latest page update: made by marichal , Jan 4 2010, 11:55 PM EST (about this update About This Update marichal Edited by marichal

    2 widgets deleted

    view changes

    - complete history)
    Keyword tags: None
    More Info: links to this page
    There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.